Genomics and Bioinformatics Group Genomics and Bioinformatics Group Genomics and Bioinformatics Group
Genomics and Bioinformatics Group

2007 Publication

Genomics and Bioinformatics Group
   Home
  Publications
      2008
      2007
      2006
      2005
      2004
      2003
      2002
      2001
      2000
      1999
      Before 1999
      Selected
   Tools
   Data Sets
   Molec Maps
   μA Analysis
   Members
   Links
   Contact
   Search
 

Transcript and protein expression profiles of the NCI-60 cancer cell panel: an integromic microarray study

Uma T. Shankavaram, William C. Reinhold, Satoshi Nishizuka, Sylvia Major, Daisaku Morita, Krishna K. Chary, Mark A. Reimers, Uwe Scherf, Ari Kahn, Douglas Dolginow, Jeffrey Cossman, Eric P. Kaldjian, Dominic A. Scudiero, Emanuel Petricoin, Lance Liotta, Jae K. Lee, and John N. Weinstein

Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(3):820-32

Read article in journal CellMiner Home

Abstract:

To evaluate the utility of transcript profiling for prediction of protein expression levels, we compared profiles across the NCI-60 cancer cell panel, which represents nine tissues of origin. For that analysis, we present here two new NCI-60 transcript profile data sets (A based on Affymetrix HG-U95 and HG-U133A chips; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and one new protein profile data set (based on reverse-phase protein lysate arrays). The data sets are available online at http://discover.nci.nih.gov in the CellMiner program package. Using the new transcript data in combination with our previously published cDNA array and Affymetrix HU6800 data sets, we first developed a "consensus set" of transcript profiles based on the four different microarray platforms. Using that set, we found that 65% of the genes showed statistically significant transcript-protein correlation, and the correlations were generally higher than those reported previously for panels of mammalian cells. Using the predictive analysis of microarray nearest shrunken centroid algorithm for functional prediction of tissue of origin, we then found that (a) the consensus mRNA set did better than did data from any of the individual mRNA platforms and (b) the protein data seemed to do somewhat better (P = 0.027) on a gene-for-gene basis in this particular study than did the consensus mRNA data, but both did well. Analysis based on the Gene Ontology showed protein levels of structure-related genes to be well predicted by mRNA levels (mean r = 0.71). Because the transcript-based technologies are more mature and are currently able to assess larger numbers of genes at one time, they continue to be useful, even when the ultimate aim is information about proteins.


Genomics and Bioinformatics Group Home Page Link to Center for Cancer Research Home Page Link to National Cancer Institute Home Page Link to National Institutes of Health Link to Department of Health & Human Services Home Page